2014 In Review: Samanthuel's Lovely Home

Write and read reviews of games that have been uploaded to Slime Salad.

Moderators: Bob the Hamster, marionline, SDHawk

Post Reply
User avatar
Gizmog
Metal King Slime
Posts: 2622
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 5:41 am

2014 In Review: Samanthuel's Lovely Home

Post by Gizmog »

This is not at all what I expected from the author of Megaman Sprite Game. Instead of a jokey romp, we have a very introspective, psychological exploration of the author's ideal existence. Apparently, he's a dude named Samuel who wishes she was a lady named Samantha, and smushes that together into Samanthuel. On the surface, the game is a very friendly, positive look at an idyllic life in the woods. Underneath, there's some implications that I'm not very comfortable with. In that respect, this review may focus more on gender politics and psychology than the game itself, and so naturally it's going to be controversial as hell and I hope I don't offend anyone, least of all the author of this game.

Outside of Samanthuel herself, there's 4 kinds of characters in the game who I feel give us a valuable insight into how the author might look at other people. There's her pets, a number of cats and a handsome beetle. There's her woodland frog friends in the woods, and finally there's her gay girlfriend, the game goes out of its way to mention the gayness. The cats are the simplest. One is energetic and outgoing, the other shy and quiet. This sets up an easy contrast which allows Samanthuel to endorse both introversion and extroversion. The cats are okay the way they are.

The frogs all look alike, but each one has a distinct trait. One of 'em is pretty, one of 'em is talented, two of them are besties. Samanthuel takes a really weird pride in identifying the good trait of each frog, as if she has to validate their existence somehow. It's the first sign we get that Samanthuel is a person who cares deeply what other people think, though she says so herself a little later, killing the need for the metaphor. Does Samanthuel wish she were a pretty little frog, and that visitors to the woods would stop what they were doing and address how pretty she is? It seems to be a fair assumption. Like the frogs, she has no apparent responsibility and leads a life without care.

Her beetle friend is another interesting example of the author's need for validation. At the end of your trip outside, you find another friendly looking beetle, whom she takes home to "be friends" with the other beetle. There's something that's off to me about how easily she scoops up a living creature and dumps it into a life of captivity. Why assume that the other beetle will hit it off with the one she already has? Even weirder, we're told that she'll set the beetles free "when they're ready". How will Samanthuel tell? I can't put my finger on it, but there's something very authoritarian with the way she scoops things out of their natural habitat, puts them into a safe, controlled environment, and then dumps them back out into the "real world" after they've served her purpose, the way she assumes to know what's best for everyone in the woods.

Which brings us to our final supporting character, girlfriend. She doesn't have a name, any dialogue, or defining characteristics. Even "Dumb Whore" in James Dopplers Sci-Fi Fantasy Epic Quest RPG was better developed. When Samanthuel wakes up, Girlfriend is already awake and sitting on the couch. When Samanthuel gets home from her quest, Girlfriend is already in bed asleep. There's no sense of emotional attachment between the two of them, save for the three heart icons in the textbox where she identifies her. Strangely, the companion beetle also gets three heart icons in the textbox where Samanthuel finds her and much like the beetle, the girlfriend serves no real purpose other than an empty promise of token companionship: Samanthuel wants to have someone at any costs, regardless of whether there's any actual feelings between them. It's sad to see someone look so hard for validation in everyone else around them. The only person a person ever really lives with is themself, and that's the person you should seek to be happy with.

So how does Samanthuel think of themself? Let's take a look at what the game tells us about her, but first let's summarize the other characters for comparison:

  • Cat 1:
    Full of energy and loves running around

    Cat 2:
    Quiet and prefers to be away from others, which is okay!

    Frog 1:
    Pretty, a beautiful frog!

    Frog 2:
    Very talented, a frog to take pride in

    Frog 3:
    Smart, worthy of praise!

    Frog 4:
    Cool, a role model!

    Beetle:
    Very healthy, handsome and strong

    Girlfriend:
    Gay <3 <3 <3
All pretty positive, hell even her home is described as lovely! But take a look at the traits the game attributes to Samanthuel...

  • Not good at applying makeup.

    Is lucky to live where she does.

    A bit fat

    Got teased for having moobs

    Is never going to lose weight

    poor motor control mandates extra wheels on all bicycles

    always feels judged
From the sounds of things, the main one judging Samanthuel is Samanthuel. The game makes a big deal about what a positive person she is, yet at every opportunity she's cutting herself down, revealing weaknesses and generally not being positive. Even in your own ideal world you're treating yourself this way, and that's retarded. Present the self you want to be, and it will become the truth.

If you want to be a woman, then forget Samuel and be Samantha, if you want to be a man, then forget Samantha and be Samuel and if you're happy with being neither or both, then Samanthuel is perfect. But whatever you're going to be, reach out there and be it with both hands. If you can't be who you want to be in your own fantasy, how are you ever going to be who you want to be in real life? And forget about all the stupid stereotype stuff. Men aren't GI Joes and women aren't Barbies. I'm a man and I like to cook and I know plenty of women who like to work on cars. Worrying about stuff like that is petty and stupid, and fun fact? The kind of people who'd judge you on stuff like that are petty and stupid too. Ultimately, you are who you are and you shouldn't let yourself be peer pressured by society/culture into being something you're not.

Basically, if you want to be a woman and pee standing up, go right ahead.
Attachments
Yep, that clinches it! If you pee sitting down, you're a woman for sure. Thanks for playing!
Yep, that clinches it! If you pee sitting down, you're a woman for sure. Thanks for playing!
samanthuelslovelyhome0007.png (4.22 KiB) Viewed 8669 times
Women often choose to wander around the woods in their underwear, this is a good sign.
Women often choose to wander around the woods in their underwear, this is a good sign.
samanthuelslovelyhome0003.png (5.41 KiB) Viewed 8669 times
...or wherever she can!
...or wherever she can!
samanthuelslovelyhome0014.png (3.76 KiB) Viewed 8669 times
What woman doesn't seek sexual gratification in a nice dildo collection..
What woman doesn't seek sexual gratification in a nice dildo collection..
samanthuelslovelyhome0015.png (5.3 KiB) Viewed 8669 times
I guess women do tend to be bad drivers. Not much to go on, but it's a start.
I guess women do tend to be bad drivers. Not much to go on, but it's a start.
samanthuelslovelyhome0018.png (12.48 KiB) Viewed 8669 times
*IS* Samanthuel a woman? Let's use gender roles to find out!
*IS* Samanthuel a woman? Let's use gender roles to find out!
samanthuelslovelyhome0028.png (11.14 KiB) Viewed 8669 times
Last edited by Gizmog on Wed Jan 07, 2015 9:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Gizmog
Metal King Slime
Posts: 2622
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 5:41 am

Post by Gizmog »

Addendum: I have bypassed the swearing filter in this review because it insensitively assumes that gay is an insult. I don't think anyone identifies their sexual orientation as slimetastic. There's nothing wrong with that word and it's childish to block it that way. If you don't like it, you can go slime yourself.

Addendum 2: Outside of the psychology and some of the rather weird implications towards what it means to be a woman, this is a really nice game. The music was wonderful, the art really set a nice happy tone and it was a genuinely cool effect when day turned to night.
Last edited by Gizmog on Wed Jan 07, 2015 9:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Mogri
Super Slime
Posts: 4681
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 6:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact:

Post by Mogri »

Gizmog wrote:Addendum: I have bypassed the swearing filter in this review because it insensitively assumes that gay is an insult. I don't think anyone identifies their sexual orientation as slimetastic. There's nothing wrong with that word and it's childish to block it that way. If you don't like it, you can go slime yourself.
You're right; I've updated the word filter to instead censor the more universally defamatory words corresponding to the British slang for a cigarette and a bundle of sticks. The comparative and superlative forms of "gay" are still censored, since it's rare for those words to be used in a non-defamatory context.

The old censor is a holdover from a time when the community at large was less mature than we hopefully are today. Use of the word "gay" in a derogatory context will be subject to administrative punishment.

On a lighter note, I notice that someone (presumably James) has taken the liberty of expanding the word filter. His racial slur vocabulary far exceeds my own, it seems.
Last edited by Mogri on Wed Jan 07, 2015 8:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
The Wobbler
A Scrambled Egg
Posts: 2817
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 8:36 pm
Location: Underwater
Contact:

Post by The Wobbler »

Pick a random innocent word to filter to something almost normal and see if people ever notice.
User avatar
Gizmog
Metal King Slime
Posts: 2622
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2008 5:41 am

Post by Gizmog »

CastleParadox used to do that with rutabaga.
User avatar
Bob the Hamster
Lord of the Slimes
Posts: 7711
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 2:34 pm
Location: Hamster Republic (Ontario Enclave)
Contact:

Post by Bob the Hamster »

Mogri wrote:On a lighter note, I notice that someone (presumably James) has taken the liberty of expanding the word filter. His racial slur vocabulary far exceeds my own, it seems.
Nope, wasn't me! I am not even sure how to find the word filter.
User avatar
Mogri
Super Slime
Posts: 4681
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 6:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact:

Post by Mogri »

Fortis, then? I don't think anyone else ever had admin access.
Post Reply